The art of book reviewing
I've been reading on the job this week--not current fiction of my choice, alas, but dozens and dozens of book reviews. Distilling a useful critique into a brief paragraph represents such an admirable skill set; I rarely tire of scanning those little gems. Some phrases seem particularly useful for conveying literary merit.
Lengthy novels, for example, are frequently promoted as "a sweeping tale of..." I like a good sweeper as much as the next reader but have learned to note who makes that assertion. When a reviewer elects the description, it generally signifies an ambitious but ultimately satisfying scope. The identical claim from a publisher may indicate that the writer's reach has exceeded his/her grasp.
Some books "take you into the world of..." This verbiage prompts me to examine the review more closely: is that setting/premise unique or revelatory--or just obscure?
When a review charitably observes that "the author does manage to...." I anticipate a "but" or "however" a few lines further down the page.
And then there's "unrelentingly", a term that bodes more favorably for comic book heroes than for novelists. If I ever create a work of fiction, it will likely be deemed "a sweeping tale of unrelentingly inept literary ambition that takes you into the world of first-time publication (in which the author does manage to...")